A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
However, within an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens as well as the plans that are executed through the authorities for the welfare, economic progress and prosperity of the region, the Court did not make a definitive ruling to the pending construction from the grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project via the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to suggest alterations and location alternatives.
refers to legislation that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” delivers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, and how They're applied in certain types of case.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC offers for your death penalty as being the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender may be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Reasonable grounds are offered within the record to connect the petitioner with the commission on the alleged offence. While punishment from the alleged offence does not tumble inside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nevertheless discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is during the credit of the petitioner as accused, therefore, case from the petitioner falls within the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction has actually been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of your same is hereby reproduced:
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for your accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
P.C. Liability of petitioners for the said offences would be determined via the acquired trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value of your material created before the same. Till then, case of
2. I have heard the discovered counsel for your parties and acquired DPG at length, perused the record and noticed that:-
In a few jurisdictions, case law is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
three. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of regulation and ensuring that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this here stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them to get in good shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)